The Neglected Value of Effective Government · Narrate Blog Template for Framer

Editor's Note: The full article originally appeared in the University of Chicago Legal Forum

Democratic systems inevitably seek to reflect and realize a range of values. But democratic and legal theory in recent decades have given too little attention and weight to the value and importance of delivering effective government. Much of democratic theory and legal scholarship on democracy focuses on values such as political equality, fair representation, democratic deliberation, political participation, and individual rights, among other values. But less weight is given to the capacity of government to deliver effectively on the issues citizens care about most urgently.

Yet a defining feature of — and threat to — democracy in recent years is the perceived failure of democratic governments, in the United States and throughout the West, to deliver effectively on the issues their members care most about. This article aims to bring greater attention to the importance of effective government by illuminating tensions that arise between effective government and other important democratic values.

The article focuses on tensions (1) between political accountability and effective government; (2) between political equality and effective government; (3) between open government and effective government; (4) between “fair” representation and effective government (including a critique of current proposals for proportional representation); and (5) between process and participation and effective government.

Taken as a whole, the point of these examples is to bring attention to the value and importance of state capacity to deliver effectively. Viewing current arrangements and proposed reforms through the lens of effective government opens up new directions for scholarship on democracy. But the first step is to recognize that the failure to deliver effective government is roiling most democracies today, and that if democracies cannot overcome that challenge, popular frustration, anger, distrust, or worse, will continue to grow.

Read the full article here.

Editor's Note: The full article originally appeared in the University of Chicago Legal Forum

Democratic systems inevitably seek to reflect and realize a range of values. But democratic and legal theory in recent decades have given too little attention and weight to the value and importance of delivering effective government. Much of democratic theory and legal scholarship on democracy focuses on values such as political equality, fair representation, democratic deliberation, political participation, and individual rights, among other values. But less weight is given to the capacity of government to deliver effectively on the issues citizens care about most urgently.

Yet a defining feature of — and threat to — democracy in recent years is the perceived failure of democratic governments, in the United States and throughout the West, to deliver effectively on the issues their members care most about. This article aims to bring greater attention to the importance of effective government by illuminating tensions that arise between effective government and other important democratic values.

The article focuses on tensions (1) between political accountability and effective government; (2) between political equality and effective government; (3) between open government and effective government; (4) between “fair” representation and effective government (including a critique of current proposals for proportional representation); and (5) between process and participation and effective government.

Taken as a whole, the point of these examples is to bring attention to the value and importance of state capacity to deliver effectively. Viewing current arrangements and proposed reforms through the lens of effective government opens up new directions for scholarship on democracy. But the first step is to recognize that the failure to deliver effective government is roiling most democracies today, and that if democracies cannot overcome that challenge, popular frustration, anger, distrust, or worse, will continue to grow.

Read the full article here.

Editor's Note: The full article originally appeared in the University of Chicago Legal Forum

Democratic systems inevitably seek to reflect and realize a range of values. But democratic and legal theory in recent decades have given too little attention and weight to the value and importance of delivering effective government. Much of democratic theory and legal scholarship on democracy focuses on values such as political equality, fair representation, democratic deliberation, political participation, and individual rights, among other values. But less weight is given to the capacity of government to deliver effectively on the issues citizens care about most urgently.

Yet a defining feature of — and threat to — democracy in recent years is the perceived failure of democratic governments, in the United States and throughout the West, to deliver effectively on the issues their members care most about. This article aims to bring greater attention to the importance of effective government by illuminating tensions that arise between effective government and other important democratic values.

The article focuses on tensions (1) between political accountability and effective government; (2) between political equality and effective government; (3) between open government and effective government; (4) between “fair” representation and effective government (including a critique of current proposals for proportional representation); and (5) between process and participation and effective government.

Taken as a whole, the point of these examples is to bring attention to the value and importance of state capacity to deliver effectively. Viewing current arrangements and proposed reforms through the lens of effective government opens up new directions for scholarship on democracy. But the first step is to recognize that the failure to deliver effective government is roiling most democracies today, and that if democracies cannot overcome that challenge, popular frustration, anger, distrust, or worse, will continue to grow.

Read the full article here.

About the Author

Richard Pildes

Pildes is a founding Faculty Director of the Democracy Project and Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at NYU School of Law. He is the nation’s most cited scholar on election law, a leading expert on American government and democratic governance worldwide, co-author of “Electoral Reform in the United States: Reforms for Combatting polarization and extremism,” and editor of “The Future of the Voting Rights Act.”

About the Author

Richard Pildes

Pildes is a founding Faculty Director of the Democracy Project and Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at NYU School of Law. He is the nation’s most cited scholar on election law, a leading expert on American government and democratic governance worldwide, co-author of “Electoral Reform in the United States: Reforms for Combatting polarization and extremism,” and editor of “The Future of the Voting Rights Act.”

About the Author

Richard Pildes

Pildes is a founding Faculty Director of the Democracy Project and Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at NYU School of Law. He is the nation’s most cited scholar on election law, a leading expert on American government and democratic governance worldwide, co-author of “Electoral Reform in the United States: Reforms for Combatting polarization and extremism,” and editor of “The Future of the Voting Rights Act.”